On
the sunny October day that I’m scheduled to
interview author Charles Ungerleider, the Vancouver
Sun runs this front page headline: “School, police were
warned of prior knife threats by student.”
The story reports how a thirteen-year-old student
slashed the throat of a sixteen-year-old student.
A subtitle reports that “Everyone in the school
knew about the knives.” On the
previous weekend, The Province ran a front page story entitled “High at School,”
recounting the largest high school drug seizure
in British Columbian history. Two kilograms of cocaine
had been discovered in the locker of a seventeen-year-old
female student. The news was in the volume of cocaine. That illicit drugs are
present in schools has been reported so frequently,
it’s no longer really news.
As
a teacher in a British Columbian high school, such
negative news coverage is always somewhat troubling.
It’s not that I don’t want these stories
reported: it is important for the public to know
that schools are not immune to such occurrences.
It’s the fact that these stories seem to be
all we hear. Furthermore, they often seems
to imply that the school is somehow responsible
for allowing these incidents to occur.
For
Dr. Charles Ungerleider, this constant flow of media-generated
bad news is just one of the many factors that contributes
to the current state of “our public schools
collapsing from malign neglect.” In his new book, Failing Our Kids: How
We Are Ruining Our Public Schools, Ungerleider outlines the negative practices, policies, and
attitudes which threaten the future of Canadian
public education, and he then provides a number
of provocative solutions. In so doing, he offers
a much needed ringing of the bell, a sounding of
the public school alarm. He warns that if Canadians
don’t change our attitudes toward public schools,
we will very likely lose the high quality public
education system that has become an essential part
of the Canadian social fabric. The book provides a sorely needed reminder
of all that is working in schools, and all that
we risk losing if we don’t start paying more
attention to the current state of public education.
Sitting
in his office in an impressively stylish woolen
suit, Charles Ungerleider, author, professor of
sociology of education, and one-time Deputy Minister
of Education (his friends like to joke that he was
“the only guy who had the clothes for it”),
argues that our increasing tendency to see public
education as an institution for serving the individual
rather than the public good is the single gravest threat to public schools.”
For most of the history of Canadian public schooling,
we’ve had a good balance between education
as a benefit to the individual and education as
a benefit to the society. I see that balance shifting
to where people are seeing education primarily as
an individual benefit.”
Ungerleider
offers a summary of the social transformations that
have offset this now tenuous balance and the impact
that these transformations have had on our schools.
Throughout a broad range of topics (e.g. conflicting
educational philosophies, the public school curriculum,
students with special needs, teachers’ work
conditions, unions, school competition and choice,
finance and governance, the failure of leadership,
accountability, and finally, suggestions for change),
the unifying thread is the author’s persistent
effort to revive our diminishing commitment to public
education. This comes at a time when, despite the
immense benefits that public education has conferred
to Canadians, there is a disconcerting paucity of
supportive and pro-active commentary that actually
reaches the public, and an increasing number of
government policies and financial shortfalls that
impact negatively on the ability of public education
to achieve its goals.
Educational
professionals, already familiar with the challenges
facing public education, will be drawn to Ungerleider’s
many suggestions for improvement. During our interview,
he offers his most important advice for teachers:
build alliances with parents. “Get people
into your class. Most people don’t have firsthand
experience of public education beyond their own
attendance in school. If they saw what goes on,
they’d have a better appreciation of it as
an institution. They would understand the complexities
of the task that faces teachers every day. They
would also understand why it is necessary to create
the right kind of conditions for kids to learn and
for teachers to teach.”
For
the principals and vice-principals, he offers the
following: “Lead from your knowledge base.
When I talk about the failure of leadership, it
is the failure to use the accumulated knowledge
that we have in education, and the failure to give
advice on the basis of that knowledge. Over the
years, I’ve seen administrators increasingly
giving advice on the basis of other than their professional
knowledge and getting themselves into silly positions.”
Ungerleider maintains that Canadians who are neither
parents of children in public schools nor educational
professionals need to appreciate how they benefit
from having a strong education system. “My
wife slipped on the stairs and hurt herself the
other day, fortunately not seriously. The paramedic
who came, he’s a product of the education
system. I want the average citizen to know that
the foundation of what these people [members of
the community] know is the public education system.
If we [educators] are successful, we diminish the
burden that a person is going to be on society,
and if we are really successful, that person contributes
a lot back to us.” What we, as taxpayers and
members of society contribute in taxes towards public
education is returned multifold.
The photo on the jacket cover of an anonymous young
boy sitting in class in a touchingly attentive pose
reminds us, as does Ungerleider’s text, of
the profoundly meaningful role of a public institution
that provides “society’s last meeting
place.” Schools provide a valuable place “in
Canadian society where people from diverse backgrounds
regularly come together for significant periods
of time during which they learn to work together,
respecting the differences among them.” (294)
In other words, it is in schools that we learn the
values that are at the heart of the Canadian identity.
“If we care about Canada,” Ungerleider
writes, “we must care about our public schools”
(294). It is also in our schools that we are often
first captivated by the promise of a just world
where we will strive to make the best of ourselves
and our communities.
The
photo reminds us of
the immense hope and promise with which Canadians,
both individually and as a nation, first entered
into the dream of high quality public education.
Will this young boy’s optimism about what
public school has to offer, or indeed is able to
offer, wane? Will he grow tired of the prolonged,
hard work that is required to fulfill education’s
promise? Will he, influenced by cynics, the disillusioned,
and promoters of self-interest, decide that working
for the advancement of the public good is more trouble
than it’s worth, and that he’d be better
off focusing on his own individual interests?
One
can only hope that somewhere along the way, he comes
across someone who has not lost faith, and who will
take the time to remind him of the immense value
in public education’s ability to knit together
a strong, compassionate nation in which people of
diverse backgrounds feel a sense of security and
dignity.
As
our brief conversation winds up, I ask Dr. Ungerleider
for the one word that best describes his book’s
message: “Hopeful. It’s a very affirmative
act, writing a book, and I’m hopeful about
Canadian public education. But only if people wake
up and start treating public education the way they
should and not the way they have been.”
Charles
Ungerleider provides a passionate and compelling
defense of a dream that became a reality. He manages
to enter his message of hope into a public dialogue
that is too often either simplified for political
gain, or marred by sensationalized media stories
of high school violence and drugs. As a man who
has committed his impressive career to all levels
of public education, I imagine that what Ungerleider
would most like from his readers is what all good
educators want from their students: that they take
what they’ve learned and apply it.
Often,
when my work as a teacher seems particularly overwhelming,
I take comfort in distilling my sense of education
down to its timeless and universal essence: to share
with my younger students my hope and belief that
we should never give up striving to bring more justice
and compassion to the world, and that the thoughtfully
examined life is the first step toward such goal.
And, like Ungerleider, I believe, that one of the
best places for cultivating this shared understanding
is in our public schools.
Teachers
can do well to learn from Ungerleider’s message
of hope. For we too are subject to the steady stream
of bad news stories, school budget underfunding,
politically driven and pedagogically unsound policies,
and a perceived diminishing of public support that
so often lead to apathy or even despair. It is against
this backdrop that Ungerleider’s book rings
out its message: a sounding of the school bell to
remind us that, as Canadians, we have created an
education system that reinforces our most sacred
values of tolerance, respect, and compassion. And
now it’s time to get down to the business
of defending our schools for the communal benefit
of our children and our communities.
About the Author
When
not at the University of British Columbia working
toward his M.A. in Curriculum Studies, Sean Cook
teaches English and Creative Writing at Centennial
School in Coquitlam, British Columbia. He is an
outspoken social critic whose ideas have been cited
in local (Vancouver Sun,
Tri-City News,
Coquitlam Now,
Shaw Cable Television, and Teacher Newsmagazine), national (CBC Television's “Undercurrents”),
and international media (Radio-France Internation’s
“Le temps des ecoles”). In 2001, he
was awarded the “Golden Leaf Award”
for excellence in the category of "Writing
and Editing, Educational Issues Reporting"
by the Canadian Educational Press Association.
His
three-act play “School Inc.” is scheduled
for production next fall.