IN THE THRESHOLD:
THE BUTTERFLY STRETCHES HER WINGS
Butterfly, butterfly,
Oh where are you butterfly fluttering through the wind?1
(a 5th grade student)
We face new horizons at this privileged moment
in the history of science, and it is our hope that we have
been able to communicate this conviction to our readers.2
(Illia Prigogine)
Researchers in many different fields are joining together to present startling
and thought-provoking perceptions of reality which teachers can no longer
afford to ignore.3
(Alistair Martin-Smith)
I am enchanted by butterflies. To me, they symbolize fragile beauty,
mystery, poetry, and freedom of expression. I imagine how wonderful their
world must be.
Have you ridden a wind before?4
As a beautiful butterfly, pulsing and breathing, the new vision of reality
stretches its wings, emerging today from the mechanistic cocoon of a modern
worldview. Interesting time. I have not traveled any spaceships to near
or distant stars, and I did not crawl through wormholes from one parallel
universe to another. As far as I remember, I have never left the Earth,
but my entire world is changing. Nothing is the same anymore. As a piece
of clay in a child's hands, all familiar and taken for granted attributes
of a physical reality - matter, energy, time, space, as well as the entire
Universe - are gradually transforming into something drastically different
from what they seemed before.
"We must begin where we are," writes William Doll, the author
of A Postmodern Perspective on Curriculum.5
At this moment I am at the threshold and this is where I begin. Behind
me lies the straight-angled cold mechanistic kingdom where I resided and
taught science for many years. In front of me shimmers an exciting world
where I am yet to live and yet to teach. Avant-garde science unfolds into
the 21st century as a powerful and fascinating force. Perspectives from
even the nearest future make my mind boil. However, philosophical applications
of new scientific insights are even more fascinating. As Nobel Prize winner,
Illia Prigogine notes, contemporary science started a new dialogue with
nature.6
While not yet organized into a coherent worldview, this new dialogue
opens the door for re-enchantment, which means departing from a mechanistic,
fragmented, meaningless, sterile, spiritless, static, and as such disenchanted
world toward something (or someone?) living, feeling, dynamic, complex,
interrelated, creative, and ever-evolving.7
As Suzan Gablik writes, re-enchantment is in the air.8
|
|
This ether of re-enchantment is saturated with possibilities for re-thinking
human nature, place, and role, as well as human relationship with the
world, from dispassionate and manipulative to respectful, caring, appreciative,
and deeply connected. In light of this, the significance of re-enchantment
is difficult to overestimate: disastrous consequences of our objective
detachment from the rest of the world are well known. I agree with Thomas
Moore who states that modern ecological, political, social, psychological,
economical, educational, and spiritual problems grow out of our loss of
enchantment.9
But the re-enchantment is in the air. It began to penetrate various dimensions
of our life, inviting us to re-invent ourselves and the world we live in,
as Morris Berman indicated in The Reenchantment of the World, David Griffin
in The Reenchantment of Science,10 Thomas Moore in The Re-enchantment of Everyday
Life,11 and Suzan Gablik in The Reenchantment of Art.12 According to Gablik,
the challenging and important task is to speed up the diffusion of re-enchantment
throughout all levels and endeavors of society. If there is a new agenda,
a new vision emerging within our society, how might one help put it into
practice?13
The idea of re-enchantment14 deeply resonates with my individual and professional
identity. I am in the midst of a personal paradigm shift as an experiencing
being and as a science teacher. The emerging interrelated, organic, mysterious
world portrayed by contemporary science truly and deeply fascinates me.
For some inexplicable reason, I have a strong sense of deja-vu. It seems
to me, I have known this new world for a long, long time. Today, I experience
an exciting moment of Aha! Quantum Leap! that relates to my thinking about
reality in general and science education in particular.
I am enchanted with the opportunity to contribute to the overall process
of the re-enchantment of the world from the dimension of science education
that currently remains chained to a mechanistic worldview. For this purpose,
I attempt (re) imagine elements of school science curriculum and pedagogy
on the grounds of a new conceptual framework offered by contemporary developments
in science. To express my intentions, I will borrow the words of William
Doll: I will speak about curricular possibilities in terms of vision.
Visions, imaginations, or as Martin Heidegger puts it, searching for horizons,
have power to (re) create our reality.15
The changes in science education I propose are dramatic, risky, and at
times difficult to articulate or to accept. It is not particularly easy
to see the beginning of something that is being shaped by a truly different
awareness,16 writes Suzan Gablik.
Although these ideas have started to move through our culture very quickly,
the challenge still remains for all of us to translate them into our own
activities and practices. Obviously, the kind of change I have being signaling
here is so major that we will encounter much resistance to even recognizing
it.17
I experienced this challenge first hand while attempting to translate
my new visions into pedagogical practice. As I finished teaching a teacher
education course, entitled Physical Science in Elementary Schools, memories
of internal struggles, excitement, tears, happiness, desperation, and
hope are still fresh. According to philosopher Alfred North Whitehead,...the
true method of discovery is like the flight of an airplane. It starts
from the ground of particular; it makes flight in the thin air of imaginative
generalization; and it again lands for renewed observation rendered acute
by rational interpretation.18
My landing from the air of imaginative generalization was not always
smooth. Freefall without a rope.19
Lots of bruises. But I am not the first and not the last. Many others
were crushed in their quest for flight. However, some strange irresistible
power, which is apparently embedded into the human nature, pushes us to
continue the quest, no matter what.
I hope this thesis will result in an emergence of a new order of complexity
out of the chaotic, fuzzy interplay of my experiences, memories, thoughts,
feelings, intuitions, intentions, and imaginations. The data I use include
my experiences as a resident of the enchanted land of childhood, a chemistry
and physical science instructor in a community college,20 the instructor
of a science education course in the elementary teacher education program,21
the director of the youth science video club Gaia,22 a mother of an unfolding
young life, a poet, and simply as a Being who, as Martin Heidegger writes,
is thrown into this phenomenal world without preliminary negotiations.
Why did I find it important to explore my own experiences? I think that
in order to propose and to practice dramatic re-enchanting changes in
science education and therefore in students' worldviews, I must interpret,
understand, internalize, accept, and adopt these changes myself. Otherwise,
my thesis will remain an artificial construct collecting dust on the library
shelves.
My own experiences, however, are inevitably interwoven and entangled
with others' experiences as well as with experiences of the rest of the
universe. According to understandings that have emerged from the new developments
in science, there is no way I can objectively cut myself off from the
world. In this sense, the entire world is my research sample. I am the
World. I am a Cosmos. This is the main idea of a holonomic inquiry, which
I attempt to conceptualize as my research methodology.
Grounded on new insights in science, the nonlinear steps into re-enchantment
that I propose, spiral down along the following progression:
A modest re-enchantment of the science of complexity:
Self-organization, creativity, ambiguity,
and interconnectedness are embedded in Nature.
The deeper re-enchantment of a holonomic paradigm:
Our reality is an unbroken holographic wholeness.
Even deeper re-enchantment of postmodern organicism:
The world is an experiencing, feeling, and imaginative organism, comprised
of organisms throughout its totality.
The radical re-enchantment of the spiritual no-no:
New developments in science invite Spirit.
The extreme re-enchantment of a plain magic:
Cutting edge science legitimizes laws of magicality.23
While writing this manuscript, I was surprised how much it has written
itself and how far I am now from what I initially intended.
I intended an ode,
but it turned out a sonnet;
I intended an ode:
It began à la mode,
but Rose crossed the road,
in her new Sunday bonnet;
I intended an ode,
but it turned out a sonnet24
Initially, I limited my study to applications of contemporary physics
for school science curriculum, but soon realized that it would be insufficient
for my re-enchanting purposes. I was forced to look at a broader picture
that included insights from new developments in biology, neuroscience,
ecology, astrophysics, chemistry, and quantum theory. Poems from my favorite
poets, as well as my own, incorporated themselves throughout my entire
essay. They kept jumping into my writing without any special invitation,
making me increasingly aware of the power of poetic intuition and of the
deep narrative nature of scientific knowledge. I wrote about science and
education, but I was unable to do so without poetry! Excerpts from children's
science fiction, written by my daughter's favorite authors, situated themselves
quite comfortably within this essay as well. Eventually, my story wrote
itself into an eclectic mixture of science, poetry, and philosophy. Before
I begin, I wish to stress my intentions and the potential significance
of my work. For this purpose I will borrow words from Peter Scott, cited
in Illia Prigogine's The End of Certainty: Time, Chaos, and Laws of Nature:
The world, our world, tries ceaselessly to extend frontiers of the knowable
and the valuable, to transcend the giveness of things,
to imagine a new and better world.25
We must begin where we are, and now is time to begin.
Of course,
this is how it must begin:
imagining the world.
Standing on any green hill
at the mercy of all blue rivers,
(re) inventing the colours of sky
and three perfect ravens.26
|