|
Writer's Comments
In this article, I explore how ritualistic
practices can interrupt familiarity and offer the potential for human beings
to enlarge the space of what seems possible. My reading of Mark Salzman's
(2000) novel entitled Lying Awake created the commonplace within
which my interpretations were developed. Through reading this novel, I was
provoked to examine artifacts collected during a Catholic Retreat I attended
as a high school student, and to wonder about how certain interpretive practices
can create conditions whereby familiar perceptions can become interrupted.
The writing that follows is not meant to be complete or necessarily self-explanatory.
Although it resembles prose, I would urge readers to read it poetically.
Like a poem, each section (I could say stanza) contains an image linked
to an experience. Although the transitions between and among these sections
are at times ambiguous, the images are meant to be associated with one
another. My aim in this writing is to present readers with an interpretive
challenge. Just as readers of poetry must do considerable inventing in
order to evoke personal meaning from the reader-text relationship, this
writing asks the reader to stitch together the images with personal knowledge.
As I worked through various draft copies of this work, I felt compelled
to offer concluding statements. I thought that perhaps I ought to reiterate
points, particularly those that hinted at the importance of ritual, the
significance of "the mysteries," or the value of meditation.
In the end, however, I decided that if this text were to "enlarge
the space of the possible" I had to resist the urge to complete the
interpretive circle. Like the novelist who creates characters to enact
ideas that eventually are controlled as much by the reader as they are
by the author, I offer this writing as a partial representation of thinking
that requires the reader's engagement before any conclusions can be drawn.
* * *
|